I spent 24 hours doing a trial of Bark App hoping it would be as awesome as the reviews and their website claim. It does have some unique tech, but ultimately failed for me.
Given that all the comparison websites between Bark and Qustodio don’t mention these issues I found, I thought I’d post this here.
What makes Bark unique:
- You link the Bark App to the actual login accounts for your child’s apps so that it can scan their email, their social media, messages, and other apps for troublesome activity. You can choose the level of sensitivity to what it notifies about as a parent. To me, this is the big differentiator between Bark and others.
- You can set what time a day an app can be used by setting schedules (school, non-school, sleep). (Assuming the apps installed list is working, which it didn’t for me.)
Where Bark is weak:
- Philosophy - the Bark app does cool deep inspection of emails and messages and social apps, but then intentionally limits the parents on what they can see. What is visible to the parents absolutely should be the parents’ choice and the parents should be able to choose what level of monitoring they do. It is super strange to have an app for child safety intentionally not have monitoring features for the parents – the people that care most about these kids.
- (I know some people out there argue that children should have privacy. IMO, that’s a pipe dream which results in hurting kids. I don’t let my 14 year old drive the car either. If child privacy is a corporate goal then they’ve picked the wrong product to sell.)
- SUPER slow vpn. I have a 1 gig internet connection with my wifi. Page loads are like 60 seconds or more. Unusable. (No, I wasn’t blocking/filtering the pages I was trying to load.)
- I can’t set a max time a child can use the device a day.
- I can’t monitor how much time a child spends on an app a day.
- I can’t see what time of day an app was used.
- The installed apps list was missing apps my child installed.
- No notification when my child installed an app. I have to manually go look at the list?
- Because of the above, no ability to block an app Bark isn’t aware of.
- Yeah, Google Family Link has some of these features but Bark should offer an all inclusive experience. To be fair, some of these features are on the Bark Phone but they should offer it on the app as well.
- No list of websites my child has visited or searches. If a given website isn’t included on Bark’s filtering list and it SHOULD have been, I won’t know that my child is visiting that website. I only see blocked activity.
- I never got far enough to comment on call logs and text messaging visibility.
- You can kind of kludge together some app control through the schedules, but not flexibly. e.g. If I want to only let my kid use an app for 30 minutes a day, I can enable that app for a specific 30 minute time slot during the day. If they miss the time slot, they don’t get to use the app. (To be fair, I think other competitors have the inverse problem of allowing an app for 30 minutes a day but you don’t get to block out when that app gets used.)
There is the chance I missed ways to address these items but I don’t think enough of them get addressed to make it work for my needs. The big issue for me is that Bark fundamentally is choosing to create a scenario where the child privacy comes before what I want to monitor and for me that is contrary to the point of this type of software. If they added the items above + their app monitoring features, I think they would have a great app.